Orders to Results

Hospital diagnostic orders-to-results workflow from request to clinical review.

Medcognit keeps the investigation request connected to diagnostic work, result or report and the clinical context where the information is reviewed.

  1. Clinical Need Identified
  2. Investigation Requested
  3. Diagnostic Work Received
  4. Laboratory or Radiology Work
    • Laboratory Work
    • Radiology Work
  5. Result / Report
  6. Clinical Review
  7. Next Care Step
Conceptual workflow view showing how work moves while patient, encounter or hospital context remains connected.

Diagnostic Orders in HIMS

How does an investigation move from request to result and clinical review?

In Medcognit, an investigation begins from a clinical need and request, moves into diagnostic work, follows either a laboratory or radiology path as applicable, produces a result or report, and returns that diagnostic context for clinical review and the next care step.

Investigation request
Clinical need creates the diagnostic request and patient or encounter context.
Diagnostic path
The request moves into laboratory or radiology work depending on the investigation.
Diagnostic output
The diagnostic path produces the relevant result or report context.
Clinical return
The result or report returns to clinical review so the next care context can continue.

Workflow Context

Diagnostic work remains part of the patient encounter.

The diagnostic team performs different work from the clinical team, but the request and result remain part of the same patient and encounter context.

Main Workflow Journey

Main Orders to Results Journey

The request moves into diagnostic work and returns result or report context for clinical review.

  1. Clinical Need Identified
  2. Investigation Requested
  3. Diagnostic Work Received
  4. Laboratory or Radiology Work
    • Laboratory Work
    • Radiology Work
  5. Result / Report
  6. Clinical Review
  7. Next Care Step

Workflow Boundary

Laboratory and radiology are alternative diagnostic paths.

Both paths belong to Diagnostics, but they are not the same workflow and both are not required for every investigation.

  • Laboratory work and radiology work are alternatives
  • Both paths remain connected to Diagnostics
  • Result or report context returns to clinical review
  • The branch is not a numbered Laboratory to Radiology sequence

Roles & Handoffs

Clinical and diagnostic teams meet at the request and review handoffs.

The key handoff is from clinical need to diagnostic work and back to clinical review with the encounter context intact.

Clinical Team

Identifies the need and reviews the result or report.

Diagnostics Team

Receives and coordinates diagnostic work context.

Laboratory Team

Handles laboratory-path diagnostic work where needed.

Radiology Team

Handles radiology-path diagnostic work where needed.

Exceptions / Changes

Keep diagnostic changes tied to the original investigation context.

Diagnostic work may need cancellation, recollection, amendment or correction while preserving the request and patient context.

  • Cancellation
  • Recollection
  • Amendment
  • Correction

What Hospitals Should Evaluate

Evaluate the handoff from investigation request to diagnostic output and clinical review.

  • Clinical-to-diagnostics handoff
  • Lab/radiology path
  • Result/report return
  • Clinical review
  • Exceptions/amendments
  • Implementation fit

Questions to Clarify

Orders-to-results workflow questions to clarify.

What starts the orders-to-results workflow?

The workflow begins when a clinical need creates an investigation request connected to the patient or encounter context.

Do laboratory and radiology happen one after the other?

No. Laboratory and radiology are represented as alternative diagnostic paths. The applicable path depends on the investigation request.

What returns to the clinical team after diagnostic work?

The relevant result or report context returns for clinical review so the diagnostic information can be considered in the next care step.

How are recollection, amendment or correction represented?

They are treated as workflow exceptions that should remain connected to the original investigation, patient and encounter context rather than becoming unrelated work.

Next Action

Want to review how diagnostic orders and results move in your hospital?

Talk to Medcognit about how investigation requests, diagnostic work and clinical review should stay connected.

Contact Medcognit